Philippines Anti-Cybercrime Police Groupe MOST WANTED PEOPLE List!

 

 

 

#1 Mick Jerold Dela Cruz

Present Address: 1989 C. Pavia St. Tondo, Manila

If you have any information about that person please call

to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines:

Contact Numbers:

Complaint Action Center / Hotline:
Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491
Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083

#2 Gremelyn Nemuco

Present Address; One Rockwell, Makati City

If you have any information about that person please call

to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines:

Contact Numbers:

Complaint Action Center / Hotline:
Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491
Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083

#3 Vinna Vargas

Address: Imus, Cavite 

If you have any information about that person please call

to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines:

Contact Numbers:

Complaint Action Center / Hotline:
Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491
Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083

#4 Ivan Dela Cruz

Present Address: Imus, Cavite

If you have any information about that person please call

to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines:

Contact Numbers:

Complaint Action Center / Hotline:
Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491
Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083

#5 Elton Danao

Permanent Address: 2026 Leveriza, Fourth Pasay, Manila 
Present Address: Naic, Cavite

If you have any information about that person please call

to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines:

Contact Numbers:

Complaint Action Center / Hotline:
Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491
Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083

#6 Virgelito Dada

Present Address: Grass Residences, Quezon City 

If you have any information about that person please call

to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines:

Contact Numbers:

Complaint Action Center / Hotline:
Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491
Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083

#7 John Christopher Salazar

Permanent address: Rivergreen City Residences, Sta. Ana, Manila

If you have any information about that person please call

to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines:

Contact Numbers:

Complaint Action Center / Hotline:
Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491
Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083

#8 Xanty Octavo 

If you have any information about that person please call

to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines:

Contact Numbers:

Complaint Action Center / Hotline:
Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491
Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

#9 Daniel Boco

Address: Imus, Cavite

 

If you have any information about that person please call

to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines:

Contact Numbers:

Complaint Action Center / Hotline:
Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491
Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083

 

 

#10 James Gonzalo Tulabot

Permanent Address: Blk. 4 Lot 30, Daisy St. Lancaster Residences, Alapaan II-A, Imus, Cavite 
Present Address: Pasay City

If you have any information about that person please call

to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines:

Contact Numbers:

Complaint Action Center / Hotline:
Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491
Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083

#11 Lea Jeanee Belleza

If you have any information about that person please call

to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines:

Contact Numbers:

Complaint Action Center / Hotline:
Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491
Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083

#12 Juan Sonny Belleza

If you have any information about that person please call

to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines:

Contact Numbers:

Complaint Action Center / Hotline:
Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491
Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083

       

 

FXCL SCAM Company Details:

OUTSTRIVE SOLUTIONS PH CALL CENTER SERVICES

OUTSTRIVE SOLUTIONS PH CALL CENTER SERVICES



6735 is insufficient to implement Section 2, Article XVII of the 1987 Constitution allowing amendments to the Constitution to be directly proposed by the people through initiative. Thus, any person aggrieved by the act or inaction of the respondent tribunal, board or officer may file a petition for certiorari or mandamus before the appropriate court. Certainly, Lambino and Aumentado, as among the proponents of the petition for initiative dismissed by the COMELEC, have the standing to file the petition at bar. Furthermore, as the ponencia had discussed extensively, the present Petition is void and unconstitutional. It points out that the Petition dismally fails to comply with the constitutional requirement that an initiative must be directly proposed by the people. Specifically, the ponencia has amply established that petitioners were unable to show that the Lambino Petition contained, or incorporated by attachment, the full text of the proposed changes. This means, by the time PIRMA’s proposition is ready—if ever—for submission directly to the voters at large, it will have been overcome by the elections. Time will simply run out on PIRMA, if the intention is to lift term limits in time for the 1998 elections. Santiago, where the single issue of the sufficiency of RA 6735 was resolved, took this Court three months, and another two months to decide the motion for reconsideration.

Stripped of its abstractions, democracy is all about who has the sovereign right to make decisions for the people and our Constitution clearly and categorically says it is no other than the people themselves from whom all government authority emanates. This right of the people to make decisions is the essence of sovereignty, and it cannot receive any minimalist interpretation from this Court. If there is any principle in the Constitution that cannot be diluted and is non-negotiable, it is this sovereign right of the people to decide. A party may not evade the application of the rule of res judicata by simply including additional parties in the subsequent case or by not including as parties in the later case persons who were parties in the previous suit. The joining of new parties does not remove the case from the operation of the rule on res judicata if the party against whom the judgment is offered in evidence was a party in the first action; otherwise, the parties might renew the litigation by simply joining new parties. Petitioners, on the other hand, maintain that the verification conducted by the election officers sufficiently complied with the requirements of the Constitution and the law on initiative. However, the committee felt that in view of the introduction of the aspects of direct democracy such as initiative, referendum or recall, it was necessary to emphasize the democratic portion of republicanism, of representative democracy as well. So, we want to add the word “democratic” to emphasize that in this new Constitution there are instances where the people would act directly, and not through their representatives. So, the Committee finally came up with the proposal that these two terms should be employed in the formulation of the Article governing amendments or revisions to the new Constitution.

Another day at the office

What were omitted were mere details and not fundamental policies which Congress alone can and has determined. Implementing details of a law can be delegated to the COMELEC and can be the subject of its rule-making power. Under Section 2, Article IX-C of the Constitution, the COMELEC has the power to enforce and administer all laws and regulations relative to the conduct of initiatives. 6735 insufficient but without striking it down as unconstitutional, the six justices failed to give due recognition to the indefeasible right of the sovereign people to amend the Constitution. It is my earnest opinion that the right of the sovereign people to directly propose amendments to the Constitution through initiative is more superior than the power they delegated to Congress or to a constitutional convention to amend or revise the Constitution. The initiative process gives the sovereign people the voice to express their collective will, and when the people speak, we must be ready to listen. Article XVII, Section 2 of the Constitution recognizes and guarantees the sovereign people’s right to initiative, rather than limits it.
HELD:
He shall also be a member of the cabinet and shall head a ministry. He shall initially convene the interim Parliament and shall preside over its session for the election of the interim Prime Minister and until the Speaker shall have been elected by a majority vote of all the members of the interim Parliament from among themselves. It is elementary that the opinion of the majority of the members of the Court, not the opinion of the minority, prevails. As a corollary, the decision of the majority cannot be modified or reversed by the minority of the members of the Court. Proposals can only take the form of proposals from Congress as a Constituent Assembly under Article XVII, or a Constitutional Convention created under the same provision. Furthermore, there is a need for such deliberative bodies for revisions because their proceedings and debates stole my money are duly and officially recorded, so that future cases of interpretations can be properly aided by resort to the record of their proceedings. This mandate, however, should be read in relation to the other provisions of the Constitution particularly on initiative. We agree with the Petitioners that this Commission has the solemn Constitutional duty to enforce and administer all laws and regulations relative to the conduct of, as in this case, initiative. Senators whose term of office ends in 2010 shall be Members of Parliament until noon of the thirtieth day of June 2010. He shall initially convene the interim Parliament and shall preside over its sessions for the election of the interim Prime Minister and until the Speaker shall have been elected by a majority vote of all the members of the interim Parliament from among themselves.

Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines

What deserve our full attention are the issues concerning the applicable rules as well as statutory and constitutional limitations on the conduct of the People’s Initiative. The oppositors-intervenors then point out that by their proposals, petitioners will “change the very system of government from presidential to parliamentary, and the form of the legislature from bicameral to unicameral,” among others. In other words, they posit the thesis that only simple but not substantial amendments can be done through people’s initiative. The changes proposed to the Constitution by Lambino and Aumentado’s petition for initiative basically affect only Article VI on the Legislative Department and Article VII on the Executive Department.
fxcl scam fxcl scam
On initiative, for instance, Section 99 of the said code vests in the barangay assembly the power to initiate legislative processes, to hold plebiscites and to hear reports of the sangguniang barangay. The barangay assembly is composed of all persons who have been actual residents of the barangay for at least six months, who are at least 15 years of age and citizens of the Philippines. The holding of barangay plebiscites and referendum is also provided in Sections 100 and 101 of the same Code. Under the 1987 Constitution, lawmaking power is still preserved in Congress. However, to institutionalize direct action of the people as exemplified in the 1986 Revolution, there is a practical recognition of what we refer to as people’s sovereign power. The presidential system introduced by the 1935 Constitution saw the application of the principle of separation of powers. While under the parliamentary system of the 1973 Constitution the principle remained applicable, Amendment 6 or the 1981 amendments to the 1973 Constitution ensured presidential dominance over the Batasang Pambansa. Let us reexamine the validity of the view of the six justices that R.A.

Updates and Articles on Philippine Law and Jurisprudence

In return, The NHTSA thanked him but did not follow up on the complaint. Sam Boyden proceeded to track the problem and during 1999 noticed another 30 such cases. If sent by mail, it must be deposited in the post-office in time to reach him in usual course on the day following. Whoever by act or omission causes damage to another, there being fault or negligence, is obliged to pay for the damage done. Such fault or negligence, if there is no pre-existing contractual relation between the parties, is called a quasi-delict and is governed by the provisions of this Chapter. The withdrawal slips deposited with petitioner’s current account with Citibank were not checks, as petitioner admits. Citibank was not bound to accept the withdrawal slips as a valid mode of deposit.

Payment or notice of dishonor from respondent bank couldn’t be expected immediately in contrast to the situation involving checks. I met many wonderful people who seemed delighted to see and talk with a foreigner who wasn’t dressed in military garb. Many of the people here speak Chavacano – which is approximately 70% Spanish, meaning in theory I could speak about 1.5% of the local lingo! My humble presence bought the whole town of Isabela to life that day, and I still kick myself I hadn’t planned to stay a few days. He seemed shy, and told me that he’d never had such a long fare before, or a tourist passenger. Looking rather embarrassed he asked me for $3US – and yep I did it – wonders will never cease – I gave a taxi driver more than he asked for! Who cares, he won’t be seeing another tourist any time soon, at least whilst this irrational fear has a stranglehold over people’s minds the world over. Then I asked him to pick me up bright and early the next morning as planned, for my trip to Basilan. I pottered around Zamboanga for a few days, visiting sights and learning as much about Mindanao as I could. Most people called me ‘Joe’ which I later discovered was a generic term for foreign white males, stemming from the American occupation and ‘GI Joe’.

It comes from the people and it must be submitted directly to the electorate. The bill gives a definite procedure and allows the COMELEC to define rules and regulations to give teeth to the power of initiative. The procedure provided by the House bill—from the filing of the petition, the requirement of a certain percentage of supporters to present a proposition to submission to electors—is substantially similar to those of many American laws. Mr. Speaker, those among us who may have been in the United States, particularly in California, during election time or last November during the election would have noticed different propositions posted in the city walls. They were propositions submitted by the people for incorporation during the voting. In a very limited extent, the system is provided for in our Local Government Code today.

  • Retired Justice Isagani Cruz underscored the outstanding features of the 1987 Constitution which consists of eighteen articles and is excessively long compared to the Constitutions of 1935 and 1973, on which it was largely based.
  • We lay the premise that the certification against forum shopping must be executed by the plaintiff or principal party, and not by his counsel.
  • This authority is likewise, conferred upon the provincial offices as may be established pursuant to Section 5 of this Executive Order.

I agree with the opinion of Mr. Justice Reynato Puno who has sufficiently explained the rationale for upholding the people’s initiative. However, I wish to share my own thoughts on certain matters I deem material and significant. We should likewise take the opportunity to revisit the pronouncements made by the Court in its Decision in the Santiago case, especially as regards the supposed insufficiency or inadequacy of Republic Act No. 6735 as the enabling law for the implementation of the people’s right to initiative on amendments to the Constitution. Evidently, the framers of the Constitution believed that a revision thereof should, in like manner, be a product of the same extensive and intensive study and debates. Consequently, while providing for a system of initiative where the people would directly propose amendments to the Constitution, they entrusted the formidable task of its revision to a deliberative body, the Congress or Constituent Assembly. I am convinced beyond cavil that the respondent Commission on Elections did not commit an abuse of its discretion in dismissing the amended petition before it. The proposals of petitioners incorporated in said amended petition are for the revision of the 1987 Constitution. Further, the amended petition before the respondent COMELEC is insufficient in substance. For this reason, I concur in the view that Santiago v. Comelec1 should be re-examined and, after doing so, that the pronouncement therein regarding the insufficiency or inadequacy of the measure to sustain a people’s initiative to amend the Constitution should be reconsidered in favor of allowing the exercise of this sovereign right.

Turning to General Cabal, the President reiterated his directive of extending his investigation of the guerrilla backpay racketeers to the investigation of violators of Republic Act No. 493. The President said that those who unlawfully arrogate upon themselves Armed Forces ranks and later on confer Army ranks to others should be investigated and charges should be filed against them. With Roger Moskaira acting as spokesman, the delegation asked that the contract of lease awarded by the government to a private person for the exclusive use of the lake be rescinded so that the body of water would be open as fishing ground to the general public. Following the courtesy call of the Rotary International president, the President received Reps. Augusto Francisco and Angel Castaño of Manila. Rep. Francisco submitted to the President a plan to ease the heavy traffic on Calle Herran, Paco. A. Z. Baker, Rotary International president, paid a courtesy call on the President, together with his wife and K. They were accompanied by Sen. Gil J. Puyat, RFC Chairman and Mrs. Eduardo Z. Romualdez, Dean Conrado Benitez, and Juan B. Carlos. Malacañang repeated its warning to the public not to deal with anybody using the name of the President in any private transaction, and to report such persons immediately to Malacañang. PRESIDENT Magsaysay also directed this day the PC chief, Brig. Gen. Manuel Cabal, to ferret out in his investigation of guerrilla backpay racketeers those who were using the President’s guerrilla organization in Zambales as a bait for attracting victims.

  • It means that the people, on their own political judgment, submit fore the consideration and voting of the general electorate a bill or a piece of legislation.
  • Lambino and his group because the signature sheets did not contain the full text of the proposed changes.
  • With regard to the petition filed with the COSLAP, the same was signed by private respondents individually.
  • This argument clearly proceeds from a premise that accords supreme value to the record of deliberations of a constitutional convention or commission in the interpretation of the charter.

He said that regulations regarding the importation of animals from abroad were being strictly enforced by his department. In this connection, the President reminded Secretary Rodriguez to intensify the campaign for dispersing animals among individual farmers. The President further liberalized the order by removing the requirement that the employee should first secure the approval of his immediate chief before applying for public lands. All the employees will have to do now is to apply directly with the Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources. The officials and student officers of the College of Commerce of the University of Santo Tomas also called and sought the aid of the President to start off their 1955 Christmas Fund drive. Jose Papa, Alberto Guevarra Jr., Ernestina Apacible, Susan Priscilla, and Teresita Merchant. According to Miss Helen Benitez, chairman of the National Family Life Workshop, 39 civic organizations, private and public, are affiliated with the NFLW. The President congratulated the members for the wonderful work they are rendering to the families in the barrios. Mrs. Maria Fe G. Atienza, Dr. Dalmacio Martin, Miss Carmen Adriano, and other officers of the association were among those in the delegation. PRESIDENT Magsaysay today assured a large delegation of National Language students from all the universities and colleges in Manila that the Administration would study bills and measures promoting Tagalog as the national language.

It’s probably aimed at destroying any evidence the investigator has obtained, or at least trying to get more information about what the investigator is investigating. The search came two months after an unreported June 3 meeting at the resort between DOJ investigators and Trump’s lawyers. During the visit, four of her agents, including the chief of the Counterintelligence and Export Control Section, toured the basement where boxes of materials were kept, CNN reported Monday. It is a crime to destroy or remove federal records or mishandle classified documents. There are other federal laws aimed at preventing the falsification of information under investigation. The presence of a search warrant and the FBI means a criminal investigation.
 Fxclearing.com  SCAM! - Case Study The Ford Firestone Case for Students who wants to use this in their MBA Operations This - FXCL STOLE MONEY!
Each district shall comprise, as far as practicable, contiguous, compact and adjacent territory, and each province must have at least one member. Given that a clear majority of the members of the Court, eight Justices, concurred in the decision in Santiago, the pronouncement therein that RA 6735 is “incomplete, inadequate, or wanting in essential terms and conditions insofar as initiative on amendments to the Constitution is concerned” constitutes a definitive ruling on the matter. At this point, it is well to recall the factual context of Santiago as well as the pronouncement made by the Court therein. Jesus Delfin, the People’s Initiative for Reforms, Modernization and Action , et al., invoked Section 2, Article XVII of the Constitution as they filed with the COMELEC a “Petition to Amend the Constitution, to Lift Term Limits of Elective Officials, By People’s Initiative” . The aforequoted provision of the Constitution being a non-self-executory provision needed an enabling law for its implementation. Thus, in order to breathe life into the constitutional right of the people under a system of initiative to directly propose, enact, approve or reject, in whole or in part, the Constitution, laws, ordinances, or resolution, Congress enacted RA 6735. As an example, I attach to this opinion an Appendix “A” showing how the Constitution would read if we were to change Congress from one consisting of the Senate and the House of Representatives to one consisting only of the House of Representatives. It only affects Article VI on the Legislative Department, some provisions on Article VII on the Executive Department, as well as Article XI on the Accountability of Public Officers, and Article XVIII on Transitory Provisions. These are mere amendments, substantial ones indeed but still only amendments, and they address only one subject matter.

The President also requested the two top finance officers of the government to study how this possible revenue loss could be remedied and to submit their recommendations within one week. Calling up by phone the Bureau of Fisheries and the Bureau of Lands, the President learned that the lake in question had been leased to a private person 28 years ago for a period of 25 years. He also learned that the lease had been renewed for another 25 years on its expiration about two years ago. He instructed the government officials concerned to study the terms and conditions of the renewed lease agreement with a view to finding ways of rescinding it so that the lake could be opened to some 2,000 fishermen. The President transmitted his decision on this matter to PHHC General Manager Vicente Orosa. However, the President told them that they should pay the fees justly due to the PHHC for their homes and lots.